ArticleScientific reports2026
A robust audio zero watermarking scheme using multi feature fingerprints and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article presents a novel audio zero-watermarking technique that is free of creating any watermark data in the original audio. The strategy depends on the robust features of the audio in order to generate an audio fingerprint. Primarily, the audio is divided into non-overlapping frames, and time-based, frequency-based, and structural features are obtained out of each frame. The features are then weighted on the basis of its stability to construct a very robust composite feature representation. The adaptive thresholding scheme is used to apply a binary sequence to the composite representation and the watermark data is then appended to the binary sequence to produce the final audio fingerprint. Lastly, the features extracted along with the corresponding binary sequence that acts as a label of every frame are then fed to a Random Forest (RF) classifier. The feature vectors derived when extracting the attacked audio are fed to the trained Random Forest classifier in order to reconstruct the original binary sequence during extraction. This sequence is subsequently combined with the existing fingerprint and it becomes possible to reconstruct the watermark. The results of simulations indicate that the technique preserves the original quality of the audio, but provides good resistance to numerous types of attacks, such as additive noise, filtering, MP3 compression, re-sampling and re-quantization changes, as well as time and pitch rescaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.