ArticleNature communications2026
An international multi-centre study to develop and validate federated learning-based prognostic models for anal cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the 'Pregnancy Black Box': a global roadmap for artificial intelligence-driven pharmacogenomics in maternal-neonatal health.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Review
- An international multi-centre study to develop and validate federated learning-based prognostic models for anal cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision oncology relies on access to high-quality data for increasingly smaller patient subgroups. The international atomCAT consortium investigates the potential of federated learning to support this, using anal cancer as a rare cancer exemplar. Here, we show that federated multivariable Cox models trained across 14 centres (1428 patients) and externally validated in two additional centres (277 patients) achieve consistent calibration and discrimination during leave-one-centre-out and external validation (c-indices 0.68-0.79). Lower T stage, absence of nodal involvement, smaller tumour volume, female sex, younger age, and mitomycin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy are associated with improved overall survival. Lower T stage, smaller tumour volume, and female sex are associated with improved locoregional control, while absence of nodal involvement and smaller tumour volume are associated with better freedom from distant metastases. These findings demonstrate that federated learning enables robust, privacy-preserving prognostic modelling for rare cancers using real-world data, supporting international collaboration without data sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.