ArticleNature communications2026
Unpacking sources of transmission in HIV prevention trials with deep-sequence pathogen data.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unpacking sources of transmission in HIV prevention trials with deep-sequence pathogen data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Geographic spillover of antimicrobial resistance from mass distribution of azithromycin.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Geographic spillover of antimicrobial resistance from mass distribution of azithromycin.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Evidence from HIV sequencing for blood-borne transmission in Africa.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop effective HIV prevention strategies to guide public health policy the main sources of infection in HIV prevention studies must be identified. Accordingly, we devised a statistical approach that estimates the relative contribution of different sources of infection in community-randomized trials of infectious disease prevention using deep- (or next generation) sequenced pathogen data. We applied this approach to the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP) and estimated that 90% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 80-94] of new infections in communities that received combination prevention (including universal HIV test-and-treat) originated from individuals residing in communities outside the trial area. We estimate from our model that the relative benefit of providing the BCPP intervention to all communities nationwide would be a 59% [3-87] reduction in transmissions to recipients in trial communities, exceeding the 30% reduction observed when providing the BCPP intervention to trial communities only. Our results suggest that the impact of the BCPP trial intervention was curtailed by sources of transmission outside the trial area and could be considerably larger if applied nationally. We recommend that the impact of sources of transmission beyond the reach of the intervention be considered when designing and evaluating interventions to inform public health programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.