ArticleNature communications2026
Predator-driven microbial feedback loops promote plant health.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil as a Battlefield and a Reservoir: Linking Soil Components to the Epidemiology of Soilborne Plant Diseases.Microbial ecology · 2026Review
- Network Topology and Undominated Assembly Processes Govern Soil Nematode Community Responses to Forest Type.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Predator-driven microbial feedback loops promote plant health.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Microbiome modulation for sustainable crop production and climate resilience.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Top-down trophic interactions are major drivers of microbiome dynamics, yet their outcomes are difficult to predict and their consequences for pathogen control remain unclear. We combine synthetic bacterial communities of varying complexity with field studies and microcosm assays to test whether microbivorous nematodes reorganize microbiomes to suppress soilborne disease. Field studies show stronger nematode-microbe associations around healthy plants, and microcosm assays confirm that nematode presence produces stable suppression, whereas microbe-only communities collapse under pathogen invasion. Nematode predation depletes non-preferred bacterial taxa and enriches metabolically versatile taxa within Proteobacteria, increasing community-level antagonistic potential and promoting complementary resource-use interactions linked to pathogen inhibition, yielding suppression beyond individual or pairwise effects. A minimal four-component feedback loop linking a nematode predator, plant pathogens, and two plant-associated bacteria with complementary functions accounts for the emergent outcome. Together, these results reveal an animal-mediated pathway of microbiome assembly that enhances resistance to pathogen invasion and provide a trophically informed framework for designing stable, disease-suppressive microbiomes in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.