Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831720›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Prognostic value of end-to-end deep learning assessment of myocardial scar and microvascular obstruction on late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Pei Yang, Shuang Leng, Dexiang Zong, Mengyao Hu, Ru-San Tan, Xuan Xiao, Ching Hui Sia, Lynette Teo, Tim Leiner, Ching Ching Ong and 6 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pei YangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China; Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Imaging, Nanchang, China; National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Shuang LengNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Dexiang ZongNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Mengyao HuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China; Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Imaging, Nanchang, China; National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Ru-San TanCardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Xuan XiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China; Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Imaging, Nanchang, China.
Ching Hui SiaDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lynette TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Tim LeinerMayo Clinic in Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ching Ching OngYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Angela S KohCardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Swee Yaw TanCardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Lianggeng GongDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China; Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Imaging, Nanchang, China. Electronic address: gong111999@163.com.
Derek J HausenloyNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Mark Y ChanDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Liang ZhongNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: zhong.liang@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLate gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference standard for assessing myocardial scar and microvascular obstruction (MVO), and is a strong predictor of post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) outcomes. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability, limiting clinical scalability. This study develops and validates LGE-CMRnet, an end-to-end deep learning pipeline for automated scar and MVO segmentation on LGE CMR, and evaluates its prognostic value in AMI patients.

methodsA total of 3874 LGE images from 567 AMI patients (409 for training/internal stress-test cohort; 158 for external testing) were analyzed. LGE-CMRnet integrates YOLOv8 for heart localization and nnU-Net for simultaneous segmentation of myocardium, scar, and MVO. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis against expert annotations. Prognostic value was assessed using Cox regression for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over a median follow-up of 24.4 months.

resultsLGE-CMRnet achieved rapid processing (0.05 s per image) and high segmentation accuracy. In the external validation cohort, the model achieved mean DSC of 0.83 ± 0.11 for scar and 0.88 ± 0.11 for MVO at the patient level, with strong volumetric correlations to expert reference segmentations (scar: r = 0.90; MVO: r = 0.98, both P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias in volumetric measurements (scar: 2.5 ± 8.9 cm

conclusionLGE-CMRnet enables fast and accurate scar and MVO quantification, with prognostic performance comparable to expert analysis, supporting its potential for automated clinical risk stratification after AMI.

Indexed as

CicatrixContrast MediaCoronary CirculationDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMicrocirculationMicrovesselsMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumOrganometallic CompoundsAgedFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleContrast MediaOrganometallic CompoundsCardiovascular magnetic resonanceDeep learningLate gadolinium enhancementMicrovascular obstructionMyocardial scarPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41831720
PMCPMC13237551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.