ArticleHuman pathology2026
The impact of next generation sequencing studies on the diagnosis of BAP1 inactivated melanocytic tumors.
Article in Human pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Is Pediatric Melanoma? Clinical and Genomic Features and the Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Tumor Classification.International journal of dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BAP1 inactivated melanocytic tumors (BIMTs) are recognized for their potential for significant morphologic atypia including nuclear atypia, expansile growth, and mitotic activity, making it difficult to form firm morphologic criteria for malignancy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming increasingly utilized in melanocytic pathology. We conducted a two-phase survey with 26 dermatopathologists from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group to assess the impact of NGS on diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement in 31 BIMTs. After NGS results, interobserver agreement improved from fair on Survey 1 (κ = 0.348) to moderate on Survey 2 (κ = 0.441). Respondents were 1.7 times more likely to be correct on Survey 2 after NGS results (OR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.16-2.44], p = 0.005). When accounting for case variability and difficulty, respondents were 8.7 times more likely to provide a correct diagnosis for a given case (CMH OR = 8.69, 95% CI [4.89-15.44], p < 0.001). Among the 8 BAP1 inactivated melanomas in this study, 3 transitioned from a majority of votes for benign/intermediate grade BIMT to a majority of votes for melanoma after seeing NGS data. Genomic aberrations exclusive to malignant cases included pathogenic variants in TERT-p, CDKN2A, PTEN, and amplification of MYC. Our study suggests NGS has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for BAP1 inactivated melanocytic tumors. With the advent of increasingly effective therapies for melanoma, there is value in forming a definitive diagnosis of melanoma when appropriate. Additional studies with greater case numbers and follow-up are needed to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.