ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Preliminary examination of disgust learning as a potential OCD endophenotype.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endophenotypes (intermediate phenotypes) are traits hypothesized to represent genetic risk for disorders such as OCD. However, it is unclear if disgust conditioning abnormalities may function as an OCD endophenotype. The present study sought to examine the extent which disgust conditioning abnormalities characterize OCD in a manner that is consistent with an endophenotype. Participants with OCD (n = 30), first-degree relatives (n = 27), and unrelated age-matched healthy controls (n = 25) completed a disgust conditioning task in which one neutral food item (conditioned stimulus; CS+) was followed by disgusting videos of individuals vomiting (unconditioned stimulus; US) and another neutral food item (CS-) was not reinforced with the disgusting video. Following this acquisition phase, there was an extinction phase in which both CSs were presented unreinforced. As predicted, the CS+ was rated as significantly more disgusting than the CS- after two blocks of acquisition and this pattern was eliminated after extinction. Although no group differences emerged as a function of the CS+ compared to the CS-, the OCD group reported statistically significantly higher disgust ratings to both CSs during acquisition (but not at habituation or extinction) than relatives and controls. However, relatives and controls did not significantly differ from each other. Additionally, disgust proneness explained the group difference between those with and without OCD in disgust responding to both CSs at acquisition. These findings suggest a readiness for disgust conditioning in OCD that may be the product of heightened disgust proneness but provide no evidence that it functions as an endophenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.