ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Preventing Inferior Alveolar Nerve Paresthesia After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), an autologous biomaterial, has been increasingly utilized to mitigate postoperative pain, edema, and alveolar osteitis, while promoting both soft and hard tissue regeneration during the surgical extraction of third molars. The present study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative paresthesia in patients undergoing impacted third molar surgery with PRF application versus those treated without PRF. Materials and Methods: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted involving patients scheduled for surgical extraction of impacted third molars. Cone-beam computed tomography was utilized preoperatively to confirm the anatomical relationship between the inferior alveolar nerve canal and the tooth roots. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the intervention group received PRF placement within the extraction socket, whereas the control group received no adjunctive material. The incidence of postoperative paresthesia was evaluated on the seventh day following surgery using the light-touch sensory test. Statistical Analysis: Normality was assessed via the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and group comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 100 participants were enrolled in the study, comprising 67 females and 33 males, with a mean age of 23.78 ± 3.49 years. There were no statistically significant differences in age or sex distribution between the PRF and control groups ( Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that PRF did not significantly reduce the incidence of paresthesia following mandibular third molar extraction. Nonetheless, the results underscore the importance of further research to elucidate PRF's potential role in neurosensory recovery and postoperative outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.