ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
All-in-One Underwater Quality Evaluation Metamaterial With Mechanical Robustness, Sound Attenuation, and Diffuse Reflection.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To resolve acoustic-mechanical conflicts and integrate research gaps in underwater coatings. Inspired by the biomechanics of jumping spiders and human bones, we design an underwater composite structure subject to hydrostatic pressure. Based on mechanisms involving weak energy entanglement driven by damping and wave-mode conversion driven by impedance mismatch. A synergistic combination of theoretical modeling, numerical simulation, and experimental validation, the structure achieves low-intensity diffuse reflection below 0.8 kHz, and broadband low-frequency sound attenuation at 0.8-2.5 kHz (insulation > 26 dB, absorption > 0.8). Notably, this structure achieves significant sound attenuation with an absorption coefficient exceeding 0.8 below 4 kHz even under 3 MPa of hydrostatic pressure. The sound attenuation performance decreases by an average of only 4.5% per 1 MPa increase in pressure, and the deformation nearly 100% recovers after unloading. By integrating an acoustic-electrical analogy model for component dimensionality reduction and a convolutional neural network for visual quality evaluation, we establish an integrated design-evaluation framework. This strategy provides a scalable approach for next-generation underwater acoustic skins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.