Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831238›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2026

Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes Jointly Explain Mesopredator Movement and Foraging Ecology.

Katie R N Florko, Tyler R Ross, Steven H Ferguson, Joseph M Northrup, Martyn E Obbard, Gregory W Thiemann, David J Yurkowski, Marie Auger-Méthé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katie R N FlorkoInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3829-7447
Tyler R RossDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-4890
Steven H FergusonFisheries and Oceans Canada, Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-0122
Joseph M NorthrupWildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-4138
Martyn E ObbardWildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-0155
Gregory W ThiemannFaculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-900X
David J YurkowskiFisheries and Oceans Canada, Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-167X
Marie Auger-MéthéInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3550-4930

Funding

ArcticNetCanada Foundation for InnovationCanada Research ChairsCanadian Wildlife FederationFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNunavut Wildlife Management BoardPolar Knowledge CanadaWeston Family FoundationWildlife Conservation Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prey availability and predation risk drive animal distribution, movement, and foraging ecology, yet studies rarely analyse multiple predator-prey levels together. Understanding how predators optimise risk-reward tradeoffs is important for species conservation and management, especially in systems facing extreme ecosystem change. We examined how top-down (modelled polar bear habitat selection) and bottom-up (modelled fish diversity) processes influence the habitat selection, movement, and foraging behaviour of 26 ringed seals (greater than 70,000 dives and 10,000 locations over 877 seal days). Our results suggest that polar bears spatially restrict seal movements and reduce the time seals spend foraging, potentially decreasing foraging success. Seals were more likely to be present and dive longer in high-predation risk areas when prey diversity was high. Further, seal habitat selection models excluding polar bears overestimated core space use. These findings illustrate the dynamic tradeoffs that mesopredators make when balancing predation risk and resource acquisition.

Indexed as

EcosystemFeeding BehaviorFood ChainPredatory BehaviorSeals, EarlessUrsidaeAnimalsArctic RegionsModels, BiologicalArcticforaging behaviourhabitat selectionlandscape of fearnon‐consumptive effectspolar bear (Ursus maritimus)predator–prey dynamicsringed seal (Pusa hispida)satellite telemetrytrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID41831238
PMCPMC12988822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.