ArticleVirus genes2026
APOBEC cellular enzymes as 'court jesters' in SARS-CoV-2 evolution.
Article in Virus genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human cellular APOBEC enzymes were largely reported as involved in innate antiviral defenses. We previously highlighted that in SARS-CoV-2 genomes obtained in our center, nearly half of 'hyperfertile' or 'fertile' mutations while 23% of neutral/weakly deleterious mutations had APOBEC signatures. Here we determined that 29% of mutations we named 'lethal' as detected in quasispecies but not in consensus genomes have APOBEC signatures. Overall, these results do not suggest that human APOBEC acts as defense agents against SARS-CoV-2 but as 'Court Jesters', being neither friends nor foes but only enzymes whose activity can either favor or hamper viral fitness according to the Kimura theory of neutral evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41831199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.