Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831136›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Measurement of pregnancy rate and foetal loss, and their associations with management practices on reproductive performance of smallholder beef cattle heifers in South Africa.

Marble Nkadimeng, Este van Marle-Köster, Nkhanedzeni B Nengovhela, Fhulufhelo V Ramukhithi, Johannes M Rust, Mahlako L Makgahlela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marble NkadimengAgricultural Research Council, Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane, 0062, South Africa. nkadimengm1@arc.agric.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-0568
Este van Marle-KösterDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3672-6976
Nkhanedzeni B NengovhelaDepartment of Agriculture, Delpen Building, Corner Annie Botha and Union Street, Riviera, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-5789
Fhulufhelo V RamukhithiLimpopo Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Mara Research Station, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-5315
Johannes M RustDöhne Agricultural Development Institute, Stutterheim, 4930, South Africa.
Mahlako L MakgahlelaAgricultural Research Council, Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane, 0062, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-4558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding reproductive performance of replacement heifers is pivotal for sustainable and profitable farming in any cattle production system. The study assessed reproductive performance of smallholder beef cattle heifers focusing on pregnancy rate (PR); and fetal and calf loss (FCL). Additionally, it investigated herd management factors that influence these traits. A total of 538 heifer records were collected from 40 herds representing five provinces between 2018 and 2019. A secondary application of established seasonal pregnancy diagnosis methods was used to measure PR and FCL. Management factors including body condition score (BCS), age at first mating and calving, breed type, heifer selection, record-keeping, frame size, breeding and calving season were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method analysed reproductive outcomes, while the Cox proportional hazards model assessed management factors influencing PR and FCL. Results indicated an average of 47% PR and 11% FCL with achievable levels of 60% PR and 0.9% FCL. Majority of heifers conceived between ages four and five years. At three years, 96.19% of heifers had not experienced loss, however, the calf survival probability decreased to 68.17% by five years. The median age for first calving was four, by age five, 72.96% of heifers had calved. The results showed significant effects (P < 0.05) for breed type, breeding season, BCS, frame size and heifer selection on PR and FCL. Optimizing PR and FCL in smallholder heifers may depend on improving management practices including selection practices of heifers prior to breeding, maintaining optimum BCS and breeding during favourable environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryAnimal HusbandryPregnancy RateReproductionAnimalsBreedingCattleFemalePregnancySeasonsSouth AfricaCalf lossHeifer selectionHerd management toolPregnancy diagnosisReproductive management

Identifiers

PMID41831136
PMCPMC12988890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.