ArticleArchiv der Pharmazie2026
AI-Based Prediction of PROTAC- and Molecular Glue-Mediated Ternary Complexes: A Comparative Evaluation of AlphaFold 3 and Boltz-2.
Article in Archiv der Pharmazie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and molecular glues induce ligand-mediated ternary complexes between an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a protein of interest, but their in silico modeling remains challenging due to conformational flexibility and weak protein-protein interfaces. Recent diffusion-based AI structure prediction models enable the direct prediction of protein-ligand complexes. Here we benchmarked AlphaFold 3 and Boltz-2 for predicting PROTAC- and molecular glue-mediated ternary complexes using a reproducible evaluation workflow. We curated a dataset of 40 experimentally resolved complexes from the Protein Data Bank, including 25 PROTAC and 15 molecular glue systems. Structural accuracy was assessed using complex RMSD and DockQ scores relative to the corresponding crystal structures and compared to model-internal confidence metrics. Both models outperform other current approaches in both accuracy and runtime. Boltz-2 shows higher prediction accuracy assessed by complex RMSD and DockQ scores. Predictions are generally more accurate for VHL-based PROTACs than for CRBN-based PROTACs. Predictions for molecular glue complexes show good overall accuracy. Error analysis indicates that prediction failures predominantly arise from misoriented global arrangements and twisting in flexible ternary complexes, while individual protein and ligand structures are often accurately modeled. Limitations in the generalizability of the models could also be observed, especially for more recently released structures. These findings suggest that diffusion-based AlphaFold-type models show promise in the structure-based prediction of PROTAC- and molecular glue-mediated ternary complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.