Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831104›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2026

Enhancing pandemic surveillance and testing: a simulation modeling study utilizing german multicenter data with federated machine learning.

Stefan Kempter, Jens O Brunner, Frank Hanses, Christoph Spinner, Lutz T Zabel, Christoph Römmele, Stefan Borgmann, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Christina C Bartenschlager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefan KempterDepartment of Technology, Management, and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Akademivej 358, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Jens O BrunnerDepartment of Technology, Management, and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Akademivej 358, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. jotbr@dtu.dk.
Frank HansesDepartment for Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Christoph SpinnerTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Departments for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 93053, Munich, Germany.
Lutz T ZabelLaboratory Medicine, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Eichertstraße 3, 73035, Göppingen, Germany.
Christoph RömmeleClinic for Internal Medicine III - Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan BorgmannInfectious Diseases and Infection Control, Ingolstadt Hospital, Krumenauerstraße 25, 85049, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Jörg Janne VehreschildDepartment II of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christina C BartenschlagerAnaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has starkly exposed queryPlease check author names and affiliation if presented correctly.vulnerabilities in the management of surveillance and testing. Significant challenges associated with physical tests, i.e., PCR and antigen tests, include their high cost, resource-intensive nature, turnaround time, and sensitivity. Although the literature has underscored the potential of Machine Learning-based methods for the digital diagnosis of COVID-19, developing high-performing models crucially depends on extensive datasets exceeding the amount available in one healthcare institution. Federated Machine Learning offers a solution to that dilemma. The aim of this research is to evaluate the potential impact of Federated Learning-based digital COVID-19 diagnosis on the trajectory of a pandemic. Therefore, we design a multidimensional evaluation framework, consisting of a simulation study utilizing real-world lab parameters from multiple hospitals and a newly developed performance indicator, named Testing Evaluation for Pandemics. We find that Federated Learning can significantly support the decision-making process of diagnosing COVID-19 at the beginning of a pandemic while saving scarce resources. However, a warm-up phase is needed until constant performance similar to physical tests is reached. In addition, lab parameters have a high prediction power for the diagnosis and are well suited because of patient welfare reasons.

Indexed as

COVID-19Federated LearningMachine LearningPandemicsComputer SimulationCOVID-19 TestingGermanyHumansCOVID-19Federated machine learninghospitalsMulticentre dataSimulation

Identifiers

PMID41831104
PMCPMC12988995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.