ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2026
Transposon Ecology and the Octopus Genome.
Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biological Implications of a Detailed Repeat Annotation in Octopus vulgaris.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent discoveries of transposable element (TE) activity in the octopus genome suggest, to some, that these "jumping genes" facilitated the evolution of cephalopod brains and possibly contribute to cognitive flexibility in these animals. In contrast, TEs are often regarded as genomic parasites with net deleterious effects on host fitness. The octopus genome provides an opportunity to compare these proposals to a genome-ecological alternative. We review evidence of TE accumulation and somatic activity, showing compatibility with both organism-beneficial and selfish-DNA interpretations. To resolve this, we apply ecological thinking within the genome to generate novel predictions. If TEs are adapted to a "requirement niche" typically found in germline cells, then TE-population growth rates (replication rates) should be nonnegative under similar "environmental" conditions (e.g., similar gene expression patterns to testes). This invites a comparison of expression levels across tissues. It is reasonable to infer some organism-beneficial function only when TE expression levels deviate from those predicted by the degree of niche-overlap with germline cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.