ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Influence of maternal or neonatal Vitamin A injection on calf performance and muscle transcriptomics in the cow-calf phase.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of vitamin A (VA) injection on growth performance, muscle development, and skeletal muscle transcriptomics in calves during the cow-calf phase. Pregnant cows at 250 days of gestation were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: control (CON; no VA injection), VA injection in cows at 250 d of gestation (VAcow), or VA injections in calves at birth and 60 days of age (VAcalf). Calves were weighed at 60 d and weaning. Carcass ultrasound and muscle biopsy were conducted at weaning. Gene expressions were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Male calves in the VAcow group had higher (P = 0.01) ADG than Control males and VA-treated females. Weaning BW was greater (P < 0.01) in VAcalf and VAcow males compared to Control males and VA-treated females. Gene expression analysis revealed that RARA, MYF5, CEBPA, and DLK1 were higher (P ≤ 0.05) expressed in Control and VAcow calves than in VAcalf calves. Expressions of ZNF423 and RXRA tended to be greater (P ≤ 0.09) in VAcow males than in VAcalf males and VA-treated females. The expression of PAX7 was higher (P < 0.01) in VAcow males than in all other groups. Also, IGFR1 expression tended to be greater (P = 0.07) in VAcow males than in Control and VAcalf males and VAcalf females. In conclusion, VA injection during late gestation or early postnatal life improved growth of male calves. Maternal VA injection had a more pronounced effect on muscle gene expression, particularly in male calves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.