ReviewInternational ophthalmology2026
Perioperative ischemic optic neuropathy: a comprehensive review of anesthetic implications, hemodynamic pathophysiology, and risk stratification.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerioperative visual loss (POVL) is a rare but catastrophic complication of non-ocular surgery, most commonly attributable to ischemic optic neuropathy (ION). Spine and cardiac surgeries account for the majority of cases, with posterior ION (PION) predominating after prone spine procedures and anterior ION (AION) more frequently observed following cardiac surgery. Despite its low incidence, the permanent nature of vision loss necessitates a clear understanding of underlying mechanisms and modifiable perioperative risk factors.
methodsThis narrative review synthesizes evidence from epidemiologic studies, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) POVL Registry, large administrative databases, and physiologic investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on optic nerve anatomy and vascular supply, ocular perfusion pressure dynamics, intraocular pressure changes during prone positioning, and multivariate risk factors identified in registry-based analyses.
resultsThe optic nerve's limited collateral circulation and confinement within rigid anatomic boundaries render it uniquely vulnerable to ischemia. Registry and physiologic data support a perfusion-failure model in which reductions in mean arterial pressure, anemia, and sustained elevations in intraocular and venous pressures converge to critically reduce ocular perfusion pressure. In spine surgery, PION is strongly associated with prolonged operative duration, prone positioning, venous congestion, obesity, blood loss, and fluid strategies that promote interstitial edema. In contrast, cardiac surgery-associated AION more often reflects preexisting vascular disease and perioperative hypotension. Embolic mechanisms account for a minority of cases.
conclusionsPerioperative ION most commonly results from global failure of optic nerve perfusion rather than focal vascular occlusion. Recognition of distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms across surgical contexts underscores the importance of prevention. Strategies that preserve ocular perfusion pressure, minimize venous congestion, limit interstitial edema, and avoid prolonged hypotension during high-risk procedures may reduce the incidence of this devastating complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41831067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.