Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831067›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2026

Perioperative ischemic optic neuropathy: a comprehensive review of anesthetic implications, hemodynamic pathophysiology, and risk stratification.

Arvind Surya, Samer Salman, Rohan Phadke, Kyle Sporn, Luke Yaldo, Rahul Kumar, Phani Paladugu, Joshua Ong, Ethan Waisberg, Mouayad Masalkhi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arvind SuryaSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. arvind.surya@bcm.edu.
Samer SalmanSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Rohan PhadkeSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Kyle SpornSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Luke YaldoUniversity of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Rahul KumarUniversity of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA, USA.
Phani PaladuguBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joshua OngMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ethan WaisbergDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mouayad MasalkhiRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Alireza TavakkoliHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPerioperative visual loss (POVL) is a rare but catastrophic complication of non-ocular surgery, most commonly attributable to ischemic optic neuropathy (ION). Spine and cardiac surgeries account for the majority of cases, with posterior ION (PION) predominating after prone spine procedures and anterior ION (AION) more frequently observed following cardiac surgery. Despite its low incidence, the permanent nature of vision loss necessitates a clear understanding of underlying mechanisms and modifiable perioperative risk factors.

methodsThis narrative review synthesizes evidence from epidemiologic studies, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) POVL Registry, large administrative databases, and physiologic investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on optic nerve anatomy and vascular supply, ocular perfusion pressure dynamics, intraocular pressure changes during prone positioning, and multivariate risk factors identified in registry-based analyses.

resultsThe optic nerve's limited collateral circulation and confinement within rigid anatomic boundaries render it uniquely vulnerable to ischemia. Registry and physiologic data support a perfusion-failure model in which reductions in mean arterial pressure, anemia, and sustained elevations in intraocular and venous pressures converge to critically reduce ocular perfusion pressure. In spine surgery, PION is strongly associated with prolonged operative duration, prone positioning, venous congestion, obesity, blood loss, and fluid strategies that promote interstitial edema. In contrast, cardiac surgery-associated AION more often reflects preexisting vascular disease and perioperative hypotension. Embolic mechanisms account for a minority of cases.

conclusionsPerioperative ION most commonly results from global failure of optic nerve perfusion rather than focal vascular occlusion. Recognition of distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms across surgical contexts underscores the importance of prevention. Strategies that preserve ocular perfusion pressure, minimize venous congestion, limit interstitial edema, and avoid prolonged hypotension during high-risk procedures may reduce the incidence of this devastating complication.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnestheticsHemodynamicsOptic Neuropathy, IschemicPostoperative ComplicationsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnestheticsAnesthetic risk factorsIschemic optic neuropathyOcular perfusion pressurePerioperative visual lossProne positioning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.