Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41831049›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026

Validation of the SODA in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.

Rolando Zamora-Fung, Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada, Nelson Gómez-Viera, Roberto León-Castellón, Yaimeé Vázquez-Mojena, Claudia Pupo-Marrero, Leidis Jaime-López, Mario Manto, Luis Velázquez-Pérez

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rolando Zamora-FungNeurology Department, Clinical-surgical Hospital "Hermanos Ameijeiras", San Lázaro street 701, between Belascoaín and Márquez González, Centro Habana, Havana, 10200, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-4104
Roberto Rodríguez-LabradaMolecular Biology Department, Cuban Neurosciences Center, 190 street 2503 between 25 street and 27 street, Cubanacán, Playa, La Habana, Havana, 11300, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-7683
Nelson Gómez-VieraNeurology Department, Clinical-surgical Hospital "Hermanos Ameijeiras", San Lázaro street 701, between Belascoaín and Márquez González, Centro Habana, Havana, 10200, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4179-3333
Roberto León-CastellónNeurology Department, Clinical-surgical Hospital "Hermanos Ameijeiras", San Lázaro street 701, between Belascoaín and Márquez González, Centro Habana, Havana, 10200, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-8565
Yaimeé Vázquez-MojenaMolecular Biology Department, Cuban Neurosciences Center, 190 street 2503 between 25 street and 27 street, Cubanacán, Playa, La Habana, Havana, 11300, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-4562
Claudia Pupo-MarreroOrthopedic Hospital "Fructuoso Rodríguez", Avenida de los Presidentes & 29 street, Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución, Havana, 10400, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8428-418X
Leidis Jaime-LópezMedical University of Havana, "Victoria de Girón" School of Medical Sciences, 146 street 3102, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, 11300, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4180-5659
Mario MantoUniversité de Mons, Belgique. Place du Parc 20, Mons, 7000, Belgique.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-4380
Luis Velázquez-PérezMedical University of Havana, "Victoria de Girón" School of Medical Sciences, 146 street 3102, Cubanacán, Playa, Havana, 11300, Cuba. velazq63@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-2703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oculomotor disturbances hallmark hereditary ataxias. While video-oculography provides biomarkers, clinical tools like the Scale for Ocular Motor Disorders in Ataxia (SODA) offer reliable, specific bedside assessment, but the scale has not been validated in specific subtypes of cerebellar ataxias. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of the SODA in a Cuban cohort of Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2) patients and to assess relationship of SODA scores with disease severity scores and quality of life measures. The original SODA underwent forward and backward translation into Spanish, followed by a pilot study to assess comprehensibility. The validation study included evaluations of internal consistency, discriminant validity, and convergent validity in 47 individuals with SCA2 (9 in the prodromal stage) and 30 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. Complementary instruments assessed cerebellar and non-cerebellar motor parameters, cognitive function, and quality of life. Despite the SODA scale’s low internal consistency (α = 0.557) due to poor contribution from the saccadic intrusions, ocular alignment, and nystagmus items, it demonstrated excellent discriminant validity (p < 0.0001 vs. controls, including preclinical cases). The most frequent deficits were horizontal saccade slowing and dysmetria, observed in 95.7% of the whole cohort and 77.8% of preclinical carriers. The SODA score correlated significantly with the INAS oculomotor count (supporting concurrent validity), as well as SARA, CAG repeats, and quality-of-life measures. This study validates the SODA for detecting oculomotor deficits in SCA2, including prodromal stages. These findings underscore its potential as a bedside tool for tracking integrated disease burden in future clinical trials and management strategies.

Indexed as

Ocular Motility DisordersSpinocerebellar AtaxiasAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexOculomotor disturbancesSaccadic slowingScale for ocular motor disorders in ataxiaSpinocerebellar Ataxia type 2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.