ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Segmentation and morphometry of intracranial internal carotid artery calcification in relation to brain atrophy.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntracranial internal carotid artery calcification (iICAC) is a form of intracranial arteriosclerosis and is associated with an elevated risk of stroke and dementia. However, iICAC’s relationship with brain atrophy remains poorly understood. We aimed to automatically quantify iICAC morphometric characteristics and evaluate their associations with regional brain volumes (BVs).
methodsWe developed an automated approach to compute iICAC surface area and thickness from CT brain scans in a sample of physically active South American subsistence farmers (n = 1,232, age range: 40 years to 92 years, 48.1% female, 794 Tsimane and 438 Moseten). Linear regression models were used to assess associations between two iICAC features and regional BVs, adjusted for age, sex, population, and total intracranial volume.
resultsSignificant negative relationships were found between regional BVs and iICAC surface area, but not iICAC thickness. Frontal, parietal, temporal, and subcortical BVs exhibited significant negative associations with iICAC surface area (standardized β range: -0.146 to -0.066, p ≤ 0.013), while the occipital BV did not (standardized [Formula: see text] = -0.035, p = 0.249; [Formula: see text] = 0.007, p = 0.810). Subcortical BVs demonstrated the strongest negative associations with iICAC surface area (standardized [Formula: see text] = -0.146, p < 0.001; [Formula: see text] = -0.139, p < 0.001).
conclusioniICAC surface area—assumed to reflect arterial stiffness—shows a stronger relationship with regional BV loss than iICAC thickness—assumed to indicate arterial stenosis. The findings suggest that brain regions primarily supplied by the anterior circulation are more vulnerable to iICAC-related atrophy. Subcortical BVs showed the strongest negative associations with iICAC surface area, with region-specific analyses identifying significant effects in the putamen, thalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, pallidum, and ventral diencephalon, suggesting heightened vulnerability of deep gray-matter structures to iICAC-related atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.