ArticleArchives of microbiology2026
Characterization of the secretome of Aspergillus brasiliensis during sucrose metabolism in solid-state and submerged fermentations.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diverse studies have indicated that fungal growth and enzyme yields are often greater in solid-state fermentation (SSF) than in submerged fermentation (SmF). To understand the advantages of SSF over SmF, the secretomes of Aspergillus brasiliensis cultured with different sucrose concentrations were analyzed. Secretomic analysis revealed that sucrose induced the production of several polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, and that the secretome of SSF was more complex. Approximately 90% of the secreted proteins in SmF were via signal peptide-mediated mechanisms. However, increasing the sucrose concentration in SSF reduced this to less than 50%, suggesting the presence of alternative secretion mechanisms. Protein fold-change analysis revealed that certain proteins were induced by high sucrose in both cultures. Nevertheless, the relative abundance (RA) was higher under SSF. The production of some extracellular enzymes in both culture types confirmed the absence of catabolic repression mainly in SSF, where invertase and inulinase production were 1.5 and 2.1-fold higher than in SmF, respectively. Thus, SSF provides an environment that facilitates A. brasiliensis growth with minimal constraints from catabolite repression or substrate inhibition. This is due to the diversity of proteins secreted through both conventional and unconventional mechanisms, highlighting the similarity of SSF to the natural fungal habitat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41830969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.