ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Anatomic Determinants and Procedural Strategies for TAVR in Patients With Prior Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redefining Feasibility for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Presence of Mechanical Mitral Prostheses.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with prior mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) is technically challenging because of the altered aortomitral geometry and risk of prosthesis interaction. CASE SUMMARY: We report a single-center series of 5 patients with severe symptomatic rheumatic aortic stenosis and preexisting mechanical MVR who underwent transfemoral TAVR using balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Comprehensive preprocedural multidetector computed tomography was used to assess aortomitral distance and angle, annular dimensions, coronary heights, and mitral prosthesis characteristics to guide valve selection and implantation strategy. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance in most cases. Procedural challenges included valve migration, transient mitral prosthesis interaction, and vascular access-related complications, all of which were successfully managed. No patient developed sustained mechanical mitral valve dysfunction, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, or coronary compromise, and all patients demonstrated favorable short- and mid-term clinical outcomes.
conclusionsAn anatomy-driven, imaging-guided approach enables safe and effective TAVR in select patients with mechanical MVR. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: TAVR after mechanical MVR is feasible when guided by meticulous multimodality imaging and disciplined implantation strategy. Procedural success is determined primarily by aortomitral geometry and implantation technique rather than mitral prosthesis type alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.