ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Phenomenon-oriented lifeworld-led data generation in qualitative research-challenging absent or inadequate choices of methods.
Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Making encounters count: Healthcare professionals' experiences of providing care in Norwegian sexual assault centres.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper aims to articulate why and how the quality of data generation is important for developing valid qualitative research. The goal is to highlight how such an approach surpasses standardized or predetermined methods in generating high-quality data capable of illuminating existentially significant phenomena.
methodsWe provide epistemological justification and methodological reasoning drawn from philosophy of science, and our extensive experience conducting and teaching qualitative research within healthcare contexts.
resultsAppropriate data generation methods are found to be those inherently aligned with the nature and nuances of the phenomenon under study. We identify the importance of an initial thorough exploration of the phenomenon's characteristics, ensuring methodological choices emerge organically from the research context itself. There is no method that answers all methodological questions. Instead, we emphasise that all methods have pros and cons. DISCUSSION: Methodological decisions should not be dictated merely by convenience or convention within research groups. These decisions must embody sensitivity toward participants, particularly considering the vulnerable status of healthcare recipients. We advocate explicitly integrating human rights considerations into research practice, reinforcing ethical responsibilities inherent in qualitative health research. Adopting a lifeworld-led, phenomenon-oriented approach, represents a vital and ethically sound pathway to achieving insightful and meaningful qualitative research outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.