ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Developing Synthetic Orthopantomogram Datasets Through Generative Models.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer and generative models in dental and maxillofacial imaging: Narrative review of clinical evidence and future directions.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- When Does Synthetic Realism Become Clinical Utility? Reflections on Generative Orthopantomogram Datasets.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo generate synthetic Orthopantomograms (OPGs) using generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and to evaluate the realism of synthetic images through assessments by humans as well as AI models. METHODOLOGY: This study conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) aimed to generate synthetic OPGs using anonymized images from the existing database at AKUH dental clinics. Additionally, OPGs from the Tufts Dental Dataset and an open-sourced dataset from Kaggle were incorporated to enhance image diversity. After resizing all images to 512 × 512 pixels, a total of 5,383 OPGs were utilized for AI model training. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) were initially employed but yielded poor results. Subsequently, a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) was trained on Google Colab, generating 2,500 synthetic images. The model's performance was evaluated using the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID). To assess image quality, a set of 20 synthetic and 20 original images was examined by dentists and two AI models; MesoNet (MN) and Vision Transformer (ViT).
resultsThe DDPM achieved an FID score of 26.90, markedly superior to 118.49 achieved by GANs. Dental experts exhibited suboptimal performance in distinguishing real from synthetic images, as evidenced by low Area Under the Curve (AUC) scores, indicating the high realism of the DDPM generated images. In contrast, both MN and ViT models achieved perfect classification accuracy with high AUC scores. GradCAM was the explainable AI technique applied to MN to elucidate AI performance.
conclusionsInability to differentiate synthetic OPGs highlights the realism of the generated images, suggesting their high quality. The authors propose using diffusion models to create annotated synthetic datasets for diverse AI training in healthcare diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.