ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Contrasting vulnerability profiles for insular assemblages of birds and mammals facing global change.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contrasting vulnerability profiles for insular assemblages of birds and mammals facing global change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Island biota is currently threatened by global anthropogenic pressures. The limited ability of island species to track suitable conditions and their inherent sensitivity to anthropogenic changes make insular biota highly vulnerable to global threats. Although vulnerability assessments of species to single threats individually have been conducted, the vulnerability of island faunas to multiple global change drivers has not. We evaluated the relative vulnerability of 266 insular bird and mammal species from 45 islands in six well-studied archipelagos to multiple threats. We first quantified the current exposure of islands to climate change, land-use change, and biological invasions. We then calculated insular assemblage sensitivity based on species' ecological characteristics, such as diet and habitat specialization, generation length, and geographical rarity. To assess the adaptive capacity of insular species in response to these threats, we examined biotic and abiotic features, such as species' dispersal ability, terrain heterogeneity, and proportion of protected area. Exposure and adaptive capacity markers varied greatly among the six archipelagos, but the mean sensitivity of assemblages was similar across islands. Hawai'i, the Azores, and the Mascarenes had high vulnerability scores. Climate change and biological invasions were dominant threats in Hawai'i, and land-use change was the dominant threat in the Mascarenes, Azores, and Canaries. Assemblages from the Galapagos and Tristan da Cunha had lower vulnerability to current threats. The differences in vulnerability among island assemblages, mostly arising from differences in exposure and adaptive capacity, mean these islands' conservation needs differ. Our results delineate the mechanisms behind the vulnerability of insular biota under global change, a necessary step to effectively preserve island biodiversity and its associated human benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.