Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41830331›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Diversity and evolution of archaeal immune strategies.

Laura Martínez-Alvarez, Xu Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura Martínez-AlvarezDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-3478
Xu PengDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3926-7514

Funding

Danish Council for Independent Research 10.46540/4264-00120BDanish Council for Independent Research DFF-0135-00402Danish e-Infrastructure Consortium DeiC-KU-N1-2024089Natural Sciences 10.46540/4264-00120BNatural Sciences DFF-0135-00402Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF17OC0031154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaeal antiviral defense systems remain poorly characterized despite recent advances in understanding prokaryotic immunity. Here, we analyze 7747 archaeal genomes, the largest and most diverse dataset to date, revealing a striking disparity in defense system prevalence and diversity compared to Bacteria. Nearly one-third of archaeal genomes have no detected systems beyond CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification (in contrast to only 2.2% bacterial genomes), and only 50-55% contain CRISPR-Cas systems, far below previous estimates. Many known defense systems appear restricted to Bacteria, while several single-gene putative candidate systems (PDCs) recently identified through a guilt-by-embedding approach are enriched in Archaea. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that PDC-S70 and PDC-M05 likely originated in Archaea, representing rare archaeal contributions to the prokaryotic immune repertoire. Consistent with earlier studies, our findings support the existence of deep evolutionary links between archaeal and eukaryotic systems for argonautes and viperins. These analyses highlight both the underexplored nature and the evolutionary significance of archaeal immunity, calling for expanded efforts to uncover archaeal-specific systems and improve our understanding of immune evolution across domains of life.

Indexed as

ArchaeaEvolution, MolecularGenome, ArchaealArchaeal ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic VariationPhylogenyArchaeal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41830331
PMCPMC12988326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.