Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Heng HuangSchool of Ecology, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5552-3333
Jinyun TangDepartment of Climate Sciences, Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Ben Bond-LambertyJoint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9525-4633
Peter B ReichDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Thomas W CrowtherDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5674-8913
Jinshi JianState Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Kun ZhangSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Lingli LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-3151
Jin WuSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute for Climate and Carbon Neutrality, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Funding
Biological and Environmental ResearchChinese Universities Scientific FundFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities from Sun Yat-sen University 77010-13130003HKU Seed Funding for Strategic Interdisciplinary Research SchemeHong Kong Research Grant Council Collaborative Research Fund C5062-21GFInnovation and Technology Fund (funding support to State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology)NASA 80NSSC21K1715National Natural Science Foundation of China 31922090NSF NSF‐DBI‐2021898Office of ScienceSun Yat-sen Universitythe Start-up Grant from Sun Yat-sen University 77010-12255006US Department of Energy DEAC02‐05CH11231Young Talent Program from Guangdong Province 77010-42150005
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Soil respiration (R
Indexed as
Carbon CycleForestsSoilPhotosynthesisTemperatureSoilcarbon cycleclimate changediel dynamicsEarth system modelforestsoil respirationtemperature sensitivity
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Widespread Higher Soil Respiration Rates at Nighttime Than Daytime Across Global Forest Ecosystems. · full record | OpenQuestion