Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41830128›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

A Surrogate-Calibrated Updating Method for Logistic Regression With Missing Covariates.

Jooha Oh, Yei Eun Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jooha OhDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-0359
Yei Eun ShinDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0739-1281

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00211561National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00301976Seoul National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing covariates are a common challenge when applying an existing logistic regression model to new or external datasets, particularly in the context of model updating. While regression calibration and model updating methods have been developed to address such partial data availability, each has limitations in terms of bias, variance, and sensitivity to model misspecification. In this study, we propose a surrogate-calibrated updating (SCU) method that integrates calibration and updating approaches to improve the efficiency and reliability of coefficient estimation in the presence of missing covariates. The SCU method leverages surrogate covariates-variables that are routinely available across old and new datasets and correlate with the missing covariates-and applies a weighted averaging scheme that combines information from both fully observed and partially observed data sources. This approach mitigates bias while reducing variance, offering a practical and robust alternative to existing methods in population updating setting. We provide a theoretical justification and derive the corresponding estimators and variances. Simulation studies demonstrate the method's favorable performance under various scenarios, including the case with model misspecification. The SCU method is further illustrated using data from the Framingham Heart Study, where diabetes history serves as a surrogate for partially observed glucose levels in assessing cardiovascular disease risk. JEL Classification: C13, C18, C35.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsBiasCalibrationCardiovascular DiseasesComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalReproducibility of Resultsmissing datamodel calibrationmodel updatingmulti‐source data analysisrisk prediction modelsurrogate information

Identifiers

PMID41830128
PMCPMC12988319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.