ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Voices From the Frontline: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Experiences With Documentation and Its Influence on Patient Safety.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring accuracy: a qualitative study using the i-PARIHS framework and personas.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Voices From the Frontline: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Experiences With Documentation and Its Influence on Patient Safety.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to explore nurses' perceptions, experiences, and challenges related to clinical documentation and its influence on patient safety in Saudi Arabia.
backgroundNursing documentation, a critical aspect of clinical practice, directly influences patient safety, care continuity, and legal accountability. Despite the increasing adoption of electronic health records, nurses continue to encounter numerous challenges in maintaining accurate and timely documentation, particularly in high-pressure healthcare environments.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was employed. Nine nurses with at least two years of clinical experience from various teaching hospitals in Saudi Arabia were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face semistructured interviews conducted between June and September 2023. Thematic analysis was conducted following an inductive coding approach supported by MAXQDA software to identify recurring themes and subthemes.
resultsThree major themes emerged: (1) the perceived value of documentation as a legal and clinical tool; (2) barriers to effective documentation, including time constraints, lack of training, inconsistent practices, and weak handovers; and (3) nurses' efforts to improve documentation quality despite feeling unheard in institutional decision-making. The participants highlighted a shift in perception, viewing documentation not only as a protective measure but also as a key component of patient safety and care quality.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for improved documentation training, standardized practices, and greater involvement of nurses in policy development. Addressing these gaps may enhance documentation accuracy, reduce burden, and promote safer patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.