Observational studyANZ journal of surgery
Assessing Cognitive Workload and Performance in the Operating Room: Challenges in Applying NASA-TLX Among Experienced Surgeons.
Observational study in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical performance and cognitive workload (CWL) are central determinants of operative outcomes. Most prior studies have relied on simulated environments, limiting their clinical relevance. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) to measure task related CWL in operating theatres and investigate the relationship between CWL and technical performance using validated assessment tools.
methodsA prospective, multicentre study was undertaken across seven Australian hospitals. Five expert surgeons performed 61 minimally invasive operations, including right hemicolectomies and secondary gastric bypasses. Surgeons self-reported CWL using NASA-TLX. Technical performance was independently evaluated using validated instruments: global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS), global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (GEARS), bariatric objective structured assessment of technical skills (BOSATS) and a right hemicolectomy-specific scale. Scores were stratified into proficiency tiers and correlated with workload indices.
resultsWorkload scores varied substantially within and across surgeons. Some demonstrated narrow workload distributions, while others exhibited broader ranges. Median baseline scores differed between individuals. Inter-assessor agreement was substantial (κ = 0.73, p < 0.001). Overall proficiency was high, although seven of 61 cases showed notable technical errors, with proficiency scores below eight out of 10. No strong correlation was identified between NASA-TLX scores and performance measures.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility of using NASA-TLX to assess overall CWL during live surgery and linking objective metrics to performance. Substantial inter-surgeon variability in workload and proficiency was observed. No significant association between CWL and performance was identified among expert surgeons in this study.
trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 126200001943.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.