Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829761›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Articulation Morphology of Plants and Plant Evo-Devo: An Open Morphology-Empirical, Dynamic, All-Inclusive, and Unifying.

Rolf Sattler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rolf SattlerBiology Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Articulation Morphology, inspired by the theory of anaphytes that was first proposed in 1843, ramification is the key principle in plant morphology in the open growth of plants. It engenders articulation: the formation of articles, called anaphytes. While the theory of anaphytes included tenets that are now considered outdated, Articulation Morphology-proposed here as a modern version of this theory-retains and further develops only those aspects that remain valid and fundamentally important, namely ramification and articulation. In this view, plants are articulated wholes: systems of articles formed through ramification and articulation: the formation of articles. These articles are understood dynamically as process combinations according to process morphology. For practical purposes, they may be described in traditional structural terms such as root, stem, leaf, or leaflet, but without implying a controversial and limited morphological theory such as the classical root-stem-leaf theory of mainstream morphology. Hence, articulation morphology is strictly empirical, solely relying on the observable processes of open growth, ramification and articulation. In contrast to classical mainstream morphology, which often fails to accommodate atypical or deviant structures, articulation morphology is all-inclusive: even the most deviant structures can be understood as deviant patterns of ramification and articulation. Furthermore, articulation morphology is unifying because articles constitute a fundamental morphological unit that applies to all plants from algae to bryophytes and vascular plants, whereas organ-centred classical mainstream morphology lacks such a fundamental unifying unit for all plants. Within this framework, the central concept of articulation morphology is no longer

Indexed as

anaphytescomplementarityhomologyopen growthphilosophy of plant morphologyplant evo-devoplant morpho evo-devoplant morphologyprocess morphologyramification

Identifiers

PMID41829761
PMCPMC12986680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.