Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Gitta FiczekDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-0867
Gergely SimonDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Matyas GergelyDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Sherif MehmetiDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-514X
Verina KrasniqiDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0000-0440-4924
Edit Mali-GáspárDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
László KommaDepartment of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Villanyi u. 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Gyorgy VegvariInstitute of Viticulture and Oenology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eszterházy tér 1, 3300 Eger, Hungary.
Geza BujdosóResearch Centre of Fruit Growing, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Park u. 2, 1223 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7911-5860
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The sour cherry (
Indexed as
amarelle and morello type cultivarsbiologically active compoundsfinal stage of fruit developmentfruit physicochemical propertiesfruitslocally bred genotypesmaturity assessmentoptimization the harvest time
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Changes in Biologically Active Compounds During the Ripening Period in Selected Hungarian-Bred Sour Cherry Varieties ( · full record | OpenQuestion