Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829687›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Data-Constrained and Physics-Guided Conditional Diffusion Model for Electrical Impedance Tomography Image Reconstruction.

Xiaolei Zhang, Zhou Rong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaolei ZhangCollege of Automation, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Zhou RongCollege of Automation, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) provides noninvasive, high-temporal-resolution imaging for medical and industrial applications. However, accurate image reconstruction remains challenging due to the severe ill-posedness and nonlinearity of the inverse problem, as well as the limited robustness of existing single-source learning-based methods in real measurement scenarios. To address these limitations, a data-constrained and physics-guided Multi-Source Conditional Diffusion Model (MS-CDM) is proposed for EIT image reconstruction. Unlike conventional conditional diffusion methods that rely on a single measurement or an image prior, MS-CDM utilizes boundary voltage measurements as data-driven constraints and incorporates coarse reconstructions as physics-guided structural priors. This multi-source conditioning strategy provides complementary guidance during the reverse diffusion process, enabling balanced recovery of fine boundary details and global topological consistency. To support this framework, a Hybrid Swin-Mamba Denoising U-Net is developed, combining hierarchical window-based self-attention for local spatial modeling with bidirectional state-space modeling for efficient global dependency capture. Extensive experiments on simulated datasets and three real EIT experimental platforms demonstrate that MS-CDM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art numerical, supervised, and diffusion-based methods in terms of reconstruction accuracy, structural consistency, and noise robustness. Moreover, the proposed model exhibits robust cross-system applicability without system-specific retraining under multi-protocol training, highlighting its practical applicability in diverse real-world EIT scenarios.

Indexed as

conditional diffusion modeldeep learningelectrical impedance tomographyimage reconstructionmulti-source information fusion

Identifiers

PMID41829687
PMCPMC12986948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.