ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Discriminating Between Fallers and Non-Fallers Using Kinematic Data from the Heel2Toe™ Wearable Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Flexible Gait Sensing and Machine Learning Recognition Based on Phase-Separated PVDF-HFP Films.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most falls occur while walking, making gait quality a logical therapeutic target. Many temporo-spatial variables have been implicated in increased fall risk, but these are dependent upon kinematic parameters of the joints involved in the gait cycle. The widespread availability of wearable sensors has made the acquisition of kinematic data feasible, and those related to the ankle are most relevant, as they relate most closely to causes of falls, trips, slips, and mis-steps. The purpose of this study is to estimate the extent to which measures of ankle angular velocity (AV) during walking are associated with falls. This is a comparative study of ankle AV metrics between people who have or have not experienced a fall in the past year. Data came from experimental use of the Heel2Toe™ sensor in a variety of settings, including demonstrations and clinical research studies. The sample comprised 387 participants, of whom 68 (17.6%) self-reported falling in the past year. Logistic regression with a natural cubic spline with 3 degrees of freedom identified AV of the angle at heel strike to discriminate between fallers and non-fallers, and the regression parameters were used to propose an algorithm to estimate fall risk. Applying the algorithm to the existing data yielded a range of probabilities from 0.0480 to 0.7245 depending on age of the person assessed. Further testing of this algorithm in different samples is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.