ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model and Clinically Oriented Web Application for 30-Day Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Interpretable Center-Specific Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification Following Mitral Valve Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for predicting 30-day mortality in cardiac surgery patients and to implement a functional, clinician-oriented web application that enables the real-time use of the model. A retrospective cohort of 325 cardiac surgery patients was analysed using supervised machine learning. After preprocessing and clinical feature selection, several models were trained and evaluated through cross-validation. XGBoost achieved the best results, with an AUC-ROC of 0.968, recall of 0.800, and Brier score of 0.058. To facilitate clinical usability, a web-based application was developed using StreamLit, enabling clinicians to input patient data and predict mortality in real time. The application includes SHAP-based explainability for each prediction, thereby ensuring model transparency. Preliminary feedback from clinicians indicated that the tool was intuitive and informative and showed potential for preoperative risk assessment. The integration of a robust ML (machine learning) model with a functional clinical application offers a practical tool for supporting decision-making in cardiac surgery. This combined approach enhances both accuracy and accessibility, which are key to real-world impacts. Future work will involve multicentre validation and user-centred refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.