ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Statistical Feature Engineering for Robot Failure Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial robots are widely used in critical tasks such as assembly, welding, and material handling as core components of modern manufacturing systems. For the reliable operation of these systems, early and accurate detection of execution failures is crucial. In this study, a comprehensive comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods is conducted for the classification of robot execution failures using data acquired from force-torque sensors. Three different feature engineering approaches are proposed. The first is a Baseline approach that includes 90 raw time-series features. The second is the Domain-6 approach, which consists of 6 basic statistical features per sensor (36 in total). The third is the Domain-12 approach, which comprises 12 comprehensive statistical features per sensor (72 in total). The domain features include the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, range, slope, median, skewness, kurtosis, RMS, energy, and IQR. In total, ten classification algorithms are evaluated, including eight machine learning methods and two deep learning models: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM-LGBM), as well as a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN-1D) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). For traditional machine learning algorithms, 5 × 5 nested cross-validation is used, whereas for deep learning models, 5-fold cross-validation with a 20% validation split is employed. To ensure statistical reliability, all experiments are repeated over 30 independent runs. The experimental results demonstrate that feature engineering has a decisive impact on classification performance. In addition, regardless of the feature set, the highest accuracy (93.85% ± 0.90) is achieved by the Naive Bayes classifier using the Baseline features. The Domain-12 feature set provides consistent improvements across many algorithms, with substantial performance gains. The results are reported using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics and are supported by confusion matrices. Finally, permutation feature importance analysis indicates that the skewness features of the Fx and Fy sensors are the most critical variables for failure detection. Overall, these findings show that time-domain statistical features offer an effective approach for robot failure classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.