ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review on Forest Fire Detection Techniques: Past, Present, and Sustainable Future.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest fires are a major concern due to their significant impact on the environment, economy, and wildlife habitats. Efficient early detection systems can significantly mitigate their devastating effects. This paper provides a comprehensive review of forest fire detection (FFD) techniques and traces their evolution from basic lookout-based methods to sophisticated remote sensing technologies, including recent Internet of Things (IoT)- and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based sensor network systems. Historical methods, characterized primarily by human surveillance and basic electronic sensors, laid the foundation for modern techniques. Recently, there has been a noticeable shift toward ground-based sensors, automated camera systems, aerial surveillance using drones and aircraft, and satellite imaging. Moreover, the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and the IoT introduces a new era of advanced detection capabilities. These detection systems are being actively deployed in wildfire-prone regions, where early alerts have proven critical in minimizing damage and aiding rapid response. All FFD techniques follow a common path of data collection, pre-processing, data compression, transmission, and post-processing. Providing sufficient power to complete these tasks is also an important area of research. Recent research focuses on image compression techniques, data transmission, the application of ML and AI at edge nodes and servers, and the minimization of energy consumption, among other emerging directions. However, to build a sustainable FFD model, proper sensor deployment is essential. Sensors can be either fixed at specific geographic locations or attached to UAVs. In some cases, a combination of fixed and UAV-mounted sensors may be used. Careful planning of sensor deployment is essential for the success of the model. Moreover, ensuring adequate energy supply for both ground-based and UAV-based sensors is important. Replacing sensor batteries or recharging UAVs in remote areas is highly challenging, particularly in the absence of an operator. Hence, future FFD systems must prioritize not only detection accuracy but also long-term energy autonomy and strategic sensor placement. Integrating renewable energy sources, optimizing data processing, and ensuring minimal human intervention will be key to developing truly sustainable and scalable solutions. This review aims to guide researchers and developers in designing next-generation FFD systems aligned with practical field demands and environmental resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.