ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Risks Related to Advanced Bridge Monitoring Technologies.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bridge monitoring has undergone a significant transformation with the integration of advanced technologies, including structural health monitoring systems, Internet of Things sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing. These technologies enable continuous real-time data acquisition, processing, and early detection of structural degradation. However, their deployment also introduces a range of emerging risks that require careful consideration. This paper presents descriptive risk listings and proposes a comprehensive risk-governance framework for advanced bridge monitoring using the SWOT analysis. The framework integrates a unified risk taxonomy and assessment that links sensor and AI performance with cyber threat modeling and data governance requirements. The application of two real deployments, the Jindo Bridge SHM program and the Stava Bridge digital-twin implementation, shows how the framework converts heterogeneous measurements for improving bridge lifecycle management with the implementation of advanced monitoring technologies. Compared with prior studies that primarily catalog risks, the contribution of the paper is an interdisciplinary, operationalizable method that couples reliability, security, and governance into a single process, thereby ensuring that advanced technologies enhance, rather than erode, the safety and resilience of bridge infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.