ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Experimental Accuracy Evaluation of UAV-Based Homography for Static and Dynamic Displacement Monitoring of Structures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensitivity of Inter-Point Distance Measurement to Control-Point Coordinate Error in a Panoramic Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Full-Field 3D Displacement Measurement of Suspended Ceiling Systems Under Seismic Loading Using a Consumer-Grade Multi-Camera Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A vision-based multi-camera fusion and CAD projection framework for risk-point identification in metro stations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural displacement monitoring is an essential component of structural health monitoring of bridges, providing valuable information for performance evaluation, numerical model validation, and damage detection. While conventional contact-based sensors provide high accuracy, their installation is often complex, costly, and disruptive to traffic. Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms and vision-based measurement techniques offer a flexible, non-contact alternative; however, platform motion remains a major source of uncertainty. This study evaluates the accuracy and operational feasibility of UAV-based homography for static and dynamic displacement monitoring. The proposed approach is validated through three complementary experimental campaigns: a controlled calibration field test, a beam static load test, and bridge monitoring under traffic loading, with direct comparison to LVDT and RTS measurements. Under controlled conditions, sub-millimetre vertical precision was achieved, with RMSE values below 0.3 mm. In full-scale bridge applications, the method captured traffic-induced displacement trends with errors generally within 1-2 mm compared to LVDT data and with RMSE values below 1.4 mm. The results demonstrate that, when appropriate reference point configuration and imaging geometry are ensured, UAV-based homography provides a practical and sufficiently accurate solution for bridge displacement monitoring which is especially important in applications where sensor installation is difficult or unsafe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.