ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
FedSMOTE-DP: Privacy-Aware Federated Ensemble Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) transforms healthcare through interconnected medical devices but faces significant cybersecurity threats, particularly intrusion and exfiltration attacks. Centralized intrusion detection systems (IDSs) require data aggregation, presenting privacy and scalability risks. This paper proposes FedEnsemble-DP, a privacy-aware Federated Learning (FL) framework for decentralized intrusion detection in IoMT networks. The framework integrates three data balancing scenarios (Raw Imbalanced, Local SMOTE, Centralized SMOTE) with Differential Privacy (DP) and Secure Aggregation mechanisms. Extensive experiments on WUSTL-EHMS-2020 and CIC-IoMT-2024 datasets under non-IID settings (Dirichlet α = 0.3) demonstrate that models with strong privacy guarantees (ε = 3.0) frequently match or exceed non-private baselines. Key findings show Local SMOTE with ε = 3.0 achieved 94.60% accuracy and 0.9598 AUC, while Raw Imbalanced with ε = 3.0 attained 94.50% accuracy and 0.9494 AUC. Even with strict privacy (ε = 3.0), these results surpassed the non-private baseline (93.20% accuracy) in the raw scenario. Centralized SMOTE showed effectiveness but introduced training instability. These results indicate that local data balancing combined with calibrated DP noise can yield high detection performance while preserving privacy, effectively bridging security-performance and data confidentiality requirements in distributed healthcare networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.