ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
ATDIOU: Arctangent Differential Loss Function for Bounding Box Regression.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object detection is a fundamental task in computer vision. Bounding box regression (BBR) losses are critical to detector performance. However, evaluation measures that rely on the Intersection over Union (IoU) between the predicted and ground truth boxes are highly sensitive to positional deviations, which can hinder optimization. To alleviate this issue, we propose ATDIoU, a novel arctangent-differential loss for bounding-box regression. ATDIoU computes distance similarity between a predicted and a ground truth box by modeling the distances between their corresponding vertices as a two-dimensional arctangent differential distribution (ATD). This arctangent differential-based design mitigates bounding box drift and reduces sensitivity to localization errors. As a result, it guides the model to learn target positions more effectively. We evaluate ATDIoU by integrating it into YOLOv6 and conducting experiments on PASCAL VOC and VisDrone2019. The results demonstrate that ATDIoU yields improvements of 1.4% and 0.7% in mean average precision (mAP) relative to MPDIoU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.