ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Defect-Intent Ambiguity Addressing for Training-Free Deterministic PCB Defect Localization via Template Selection and Dissimilarity Mapping.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated optical inspection (AOI) for printed circuit boards (PCBs) requires localizing small, sparse defects under illumination drift and minor placement misalignment, while supporting fast, auditable pass/fail decisions. This paper presents a training-free, reference-based digital image processing framework with no learning/training stage that compares each defective query image with a small library of defect-free reference templates (for the same PCB layout/revision) using a small set of interpretable control parameters. A reference is selected by coarse-to-fine matching (fast pre-screening followed by SSIM refinement on a central region), and an optional global alignment is applied only when it increases SSIM to limit defect-driven over-correction. Defects are highlighted by a defect-likelihood field that fuses an SSIM-derived structural dissimilarity map with a normalized absolute-difference map, followed by connected-component extraction to produce confidence-ranked bounding boxes. The method achieves Precision = 0.9663, Recall = 0.9987, and F1 = 0.9822 at the best-F1 operating point (0.149 false positives per image). Under the adopted box-matching protocol, average precision reaches 0.984. Precision-recall and FROC curves are reported to support threshold selection under different false-alarm budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.