ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application of AI in Cyberattack Detection: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In today's fast-changing digital environment, cyber-physical systems face escalating security challenges due to increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful enabler of modern cyberattack detection, offering scalable, accurate, and adaptive solutions to counter dynamic threats. This paper provides a comprehensive review of recent advancements in AI-based cyberattack detection, focusing on Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), Reinforcement Learning (RL), Federated Learning (FL), and emerging techniques such as generative AI, neuro-symbolic AI, swarm intelligence, lightweight AI, and quantum Computing. We evaluate the strengths and limitations of these approaches, highlighting their performance on benchmark datasets. The review discusses traditional signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and their limitations against novel attack patterns, contrasted with AI-driven anomaly-based and hybrid detection methods that improve detection rates for unknown and zero-day attacks. Key challenges, including computational costs, data quality, privacy concerns, and model interpretability, are analysed alongside the role of Explainable AI (XAI) in enhancing trust and transparency. The impact of computational resources, dataset representativeness, and evaluation metrics on AI model performance is also explored. Furthermore, we investigate the potential of lightweight AI for resource-constrained environments like IoT and edge devices, and quantum computing's role in advancing detection efficiency and cryptographic security. The paper also draws attention to future research directions, particularly the development of up-to-date datasets, integration of hybrid quantum-classical models, and optimisation of asynchronous FL protocols to address evolving cybersecurity challenges. This study aims to inspire innovation in AI-driven cyberattack detection, fostering robust, interpretable, and efficient solutions for securing complex digital environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.