Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829420›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Upper-Limb Motion Using EEG and EMG Signals: A Review.

Isabel Bandes, Yasuharu Koike

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabel BandesGraduate School of Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Yasuharu KoikeGraduate School of Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-0044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review summarizes the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in classifying upper-limb motion using Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Electromyogram (EMG) signals, focusing on the field's progression from Traditional Machine Learning (TML) to Deep Learning (DL) architectures. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search of PubMed, IEEEXplore, and Web of Science yielded 301 eligible studies published up to June 2025. The results indicate a change from classical classifiers like Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) toward DL approaches. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) remain the most frequently implemented, emerging architectures, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Transformers, have demonstrated remarkable performance. Despite the rise of DL, classical models remain highly relevant due to their robustness and efficiency. This review also identifies a heavy reliance on EEG-only modalities (60%), with only 7% of studies utilizing hybrid EEG-EMG systems, representing a potential missed opportunity for signal fusion.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectroencephalographyElectromyographyUpper ExtremityConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansLong Short Term MemoryMovementSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoft ComputingSupport Vector Machineartificial intelligenceelectroencephalogram (EEG)electromyogram (EMG)movement classificationmovement intentupper limbs

Identifiers

PMID41829420
PMCPMC12987316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.