ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Data Compression in LoRa Networks: Performance and Energy Trade-Offs of Classical and Cutting-Edge Compression Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has driven the need for energy-efficient communication in long-range, low-power networks like LoRa. LoRa offers wide coverage with minimal transmission power. However, radio communication remains the main energy consumer in end devices. Data compression can mitigate this issue by reducing packet size and transmission frequency. This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of classical and cutting-edge lossless compression algorithms applied to LoRa networks. Evaluated algorithms include Huffman, LZW, BSC, CMIX, PAQ8PX, GMIX, and LSTM-compress. Experiments were conducted using a Raspberry Pi 5 integrated with an RFM95W LoRa module and INA219 sensors to measure real-time power consumption, CPU load, and memory usage. Results show that classical methods, particularly LZW, achieve the best energy efficiency and reduce LoRa transmission energy by up to 7.41%. In contrast, cutting-edge machine learning (ML)-based algorithms, such as CMIX and PAQ8PX, achieve higher compression ratios but exhibit excessive computational and memory overhead, resulting in negative energy gains. Metadata overheads, including dynamic Huffman tables (28-128 bytes), also affect payload efficiency for small packets. These findings indicate that LZW is the most practical choice for energy-constrained LoRa nodes. At the same time, modern compressors, including ML-based ones, are better suited for gateways or edge servers with higher computational capacity. An open-source implementation of the experimental framework and scripts used in this study is available in the project's public GitHub repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.