ArticlePolymers2026
Anisotropic Extrudate Swell from a Slit Die: A Velocity-Centre Hypothesis and Numerical Verification.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While anisotropic extrudate swell in polymer processing is fundamentally driven by physical viscoelastic recovery, this paper proposes a theoretical framework to explicitly isolate and map the purely geometric and kinematic components of this phenomenon. Serving as a mathematical proof-of-concept, a multi-velocity-centre hypothesis is proposed. By introducing a semi-empirical, lumped material-flow calibration parameter, the macroscopic diameter swell ratio is mathematically extended to the discrete local flow field of a rectangular slit die. To evaluate its validity, the analytical framework is subjected to a numerical test for kinematic consistency utilizing isothermal, inelastic power-law fluid CFD simulations, thereby separating geometric mapping from complex viscoelastic stress relaxation. Results indicate that analytical predictions show good agreement with CFD data (error < 5%) strictly within the core zone of high-aspect-ratio dies. However, due to the infinite-slit assumption, 3D flow kinematics near die edges induce velocity decay, leading to local deviations that require future empirical corrections. Although comprehensive physical extrusion experiments and non-isothermal viscoelastic coupling are required for industrial deployment, this semi-empirical kinematic mapping provides a foundational mathematical basis that could potentially inform future inverse die-profile design and shape distortion compensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.