ArticlePolymers2026
Wear Behavior and Multi-Technique Characterization of 3D Printed TPU Under Simulated Pharmaceutical Operating Conditions.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the wear behavior and multi-technique characterization of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) intended for friction layers in transmission belts used in pharmaceutical manipulators. Two flexible TPU grades-TPU 51A and TPU 60A-were printed using fused deposition modeling (FDM) with varying printing temperatures (255-265 °C for 51A; 225-235 °C for 60A) and layer counts (three or four layers). Specimens were evaluated for Shore A hardness, wear resistance (mass loss using a Baroid lubricity tester under dry sliding against carton), tensile properties, crystallinity (XRD), chemical structure (FTIR), thermal stability (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that printing parameters significantly influence the mechanical and tribological behavior of the materials. For TPU 51A, increasing the printing temperature to 265 °C and using four layers led to a substantial reduction in cumulative mass loss, although hardness decreased. In contrast, for TPU 60A, higher printing temperature and layer count increased hardness but also resulted in higher wear. Tensile tests indicated that specimens printed with fewer layers exhibited higher yield strength and strain, indicating improved interlayer bonding. XRD analysis confirmed the predominantly amorphous nature of the printed samples, with a reduction in crystallinity compared to the raw filaments. FTIR spectra showed no significant chemical degradation during printing, while thermogravimetric analysis revealed good thermal stability up to approximately 250-260 °C. The results demonstrate that wear behavior is governed by a combination of hardness, interlayer cohesion, and microstructural organization rather than crystallinity alone. Among the investigated conditions, TPU 51A printed at 265 °C with four layers exhibited the most favorable balance between wear resistance and mechanical properties, highlighting its suitability for friction layer applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.