Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829327›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Deep Learning for Process Monitoring and Defect Detection of Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion of Polymers.

Mohammadali Vaezi, Victor Klamert, Mugdim Bublin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammadali VaeziDepartment of Technical Management, Hochschule Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Favoritenstrasse 226, 1100 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7714-7113
Victor KlamertDepartment of High Tech Manufacturing, Hochschule Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Favoritenstrasse 226, 1100 Vienna, Austria.
Mugdim BublinDepartment of Computer Science and Digital Communications, Hochschule Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Favoritenstrasse 226, 1100 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

MA23 City of Vienna MA23 - Projekt 29-22, "Artificial Intelligence,"MA23 City of Vienna MA23 - Projekt 30-25, "AI & VR Lab."
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining consistent part quality remains a critical challenge in industrial additive manufacturing, particularly in laser-based powder bed fusion of polymers (PBF-LB/P), where crystallization-driven thermal instabilities, governed by isothermal crystallization within a narrow sintering window, precipitate defects such as curling, warping, and delamination. In contrast to metal-based systems dominated by melt-pool hydrodynamics, polymer PBF-LB/P requires monitoring strategies capable of resolving subtle spatio-temporal thermal deviations under realistic industrial operating conditions. Although machine learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has demonstrated efficacy in defect detection, a structured evaluation of heterogeneous modeling paradigms and their deployment feasibility in polymer PBF-LB/P remains limited. This study presents a systematic cross-paradigm assessment of unsupervised anomaly detection (autoencoders and generative adversarial networks), supervised CNN classifiers (VGG-16, ResNet50, and Xception), hybrid CNN-LSTM architectures, and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) using 76,450 synchronized thermal and RGB images acquired from a commercial industrial system operating under closed control constraints. CNN-based models enable frame- and sequence-level defect classification, whereas the PINN component complements detection by providing physically consistent thermal-field regression. The results reveal quantifiable trade-offs between detection performance, temporal robustness, physical consistency, and algorithmic complexity. Pre-trained CNNs achieve up to 99.09% frame-level accuracy but impose a substantial computational burden for edge deployment. The PINN model attains an RMSE of approximately 27 K under quasi-isothermal process conditions, supporting trend-level thermal monitoring. A lightweight hybrid CNN achieves 99.7% validation accuracy with 1860 parameters and a CPU-benchmarked forward-pass inference time of 1.6 ms (excluding sensor acquisition latency). Collectively, this study establishes a rigorously benchmarked, scalable, and resource-efficient deep-learning framework tailored to crystallization-dominated polymer PBF-LB/P, providing a technically grounded basis for real-time industrial quality monitoring.

Indexed as

additive manufacturing (AM)convolutional neural networks (CNN)deep learninglaser-based powder bed fusion of polymers (PBF-LB/P)physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)

Identifiers

PMID41829327
PMCPMC12986639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.