ArticlePolymers2026
Machine-Learning-Assisted Viscoelastic Characterization of PC/ABS Blends via Multi-Frequency Dynamic Mechanical Analysis.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mode-Dependent Strain-Rate Sensitivity of Filled Polymer Yield Under Shear and Uniaxial Deformation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Experimental Study and Numerical Modeling of Thermoviscoelastic Behavior of Antifriction Polymeric Materials.Polymers · 2026Article
- Numerical Investigation of Die Swell Behavior in EPDM Rubber Extrusion: Effects of Compound Formulation and Processing Conditions.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study combines multi-frequency dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) with machine learning (ML) to characterize and predict the viscoelastic properties of a commercial polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PC/ABS) blend. DMA temperature sweeps at four frequencies (1-10 Hz) in single cantilever mode yielded a glass transition range of 115.8-123.2 °C (E″ peak), frequency sensitivity of 7.18 °C/decade, and an apparent activation energy of 335±85 kJ mol-1. Time-temperature superposition master curves were parameterized with a six-term Prony series (R2=0.998). Four data-driven models (RF, XGB, SVR, MLP) and a physics-informed NeuralWLF model were evaluated through a hierarchical validation framework. Temperature-blocked CV ranked MLP (R2¯=0.989) above RF (0.950) for interpolation; LOFO validation revealed that NeuralWLF achieved the best cross-frequency generalization (R2>0.92 for all targets) with interpretable WLF parameters (C1≈12.2, C2≈51.7 °C). A systematic block size sweep (5-30 °C) revealed a validation inflation effect in which MLP tanδR2 dropped from 0.986 to 0.592 as the gap-to-FWHM ratio increased from 0.5 to 3.1, establishing the gap/FWHM ratio as a quantitative validation stringency criterion. A physics-data crossover was identified at gap/FWHM ≈2: beyond this threshold, NeuralWLF outperformed all data-driven models in tanδ prediction by up to +0.300 in R2, while curriculum learning (freezing the WLF layer for 300 epochs) further improved the most stringent 30 °C validation from R2=0.660 to 0.731. The integrated framework demonstrates that honest evaluation of DMA-ML models requires validation gaps exceeding the characteristic feature width and introduces a quantifiable physics-data crossover criterion for selecting between data-driven and physics-informed architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.