Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829278›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Finite Element Analysis in Polymer-Based Adhesive Dental Restorations: A Narrative Review on Material Behavior, Methodological Validity, and Clinical Relevance.

Angelo Aliberti, Mario Caggiano, Mirko Piscopo, Roberta Gasparro, Mariangela Cernera, Niccoló Giuseppe Armogida, Pietro Ausiello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelo AlibertiDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-7636-4211
Mario CaggianoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-7170
Mirko PiscopoDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-6348-6642
Roberta GasparroDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-7806
Mariangela CerneraDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6356-6536
Niccoló Giuseppe ArmogidaDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pietro AusielloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7683-5133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is increasingly used in conservative and restorative dentistry to investigate the mechanical behavior of adhesive direct and indirect polymer-based restorations. Despite the growing number of FEA-based studies, the literature currently lacks a dedicated critical synthesis specifically addressing the methodological validity and clinical interpretability of FEA in adhesive restorative dentistry. This narrative review critically examines the current literature on the application of FEA in adhesive restorative dentistry, with particular attention to class I to class V cavities in anterior and posterior teeth restored with direct or indirect polymeric materials, including inlays, onlays, overlays, and tabletop restorations. A structured, non-systematic search of major databases was conducted, and selected studies were qualitatively appraised with emphasis on modeling assumptions, stress distribution, and clinical meaning. Unlike previous broad overviews of dental biomechanics, this review provides a clinically oriented framework for interpreting FEA findings across restorative strategies. FEA consistently identifies trends related to cavity configuration, cuspal support, restoration design, material stiffness, polymerization shrinkage, and adhesive interface behavior, helping to explain clinically observed failure patterns and supporting minimally invasive approaches. However, simplified material models, idealized bonding conditions, and static loading protocols limit prediction of long-term performance. When interpreted within these constraints and integrated with experimental and clinical evidence, FEA remains a valuable complementary tool for rational restorative decision-making.

Indexed as

adhesive polymersadhesive restorative dentistrycuspal deflectiondirect composite restorationsfinite element analysisindirect adhesive restorationspolymer-based dental materialspolymerization shrinkagestress distribution

Identifiers

PMID41829278
PMCPMC12986724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.