ArticlePolymers2026
Sustainable Epoxy Composites Filled with Natural Mineral Rocks: Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical, Thermal, and Dielectric Performance.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Characterization of Sustainable Epoxy Biocomposites Reinforced with Coconut Shell Powder and GNP.Polymers · 2026Article
- In Situ Gel Formation, Pore Network Evolution and Mechanical Degradation of Red Sandstone Under Chemical-Wet-Dry Cycles.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing PVA/Chitosan Films with Acid-Functionalized MWCNTs: A Multifaceted Study on Performance Enhancement.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the fabrication and optimization of eco-efficient epoxy composites reinforced with ground natural stone fillers, namely pebble, sandstone, and marble, at loadings of up to 15.6 wt.%. Low content of a bio-based modifier, modified castor oil (MCO ≈ 0.5 wt.%), is incorporated to improve filler dispersion, processing behavior, and matrix-filler interfacial compatibility. The composites are designed to enhance mechanical, thermal, and dielectric performance using low-cost, abundant, and environmentally sustainable constituents. An experimental optimization approach is employed to evaluate and optimize bulk density, Shore D hardness, thermal conductivity, dielectric constant, and tensile strength. The results demonstrate that pebble-reinforced composites exhibit the highest tensile strength (≈30 MPa) and surface hardness (≈82 Shore D), which are attributed to the angular morphology and high intrinsic rigidity of pebble particles. Marble-filled systems show superior thermal stability, with residual mass increasing from approximately 2.5 wt.% for neat epoxy to over 11 wt.% at 550 °C, owing to the thermally stable calcium carbonate phase. In contrast, sandstone-reinforced composites exhibit the lowest dielectric constant (≈3.2), indicating enhanced electrical insulation capability. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results confirm that the epoxy network structure is preserved upon filler incorporation, while MCO promotes improved interfacial interactions through physical interactions. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveal enhanced thermal resistance, reduced microvoid formation, and improved filler-matrix adhesion at optimal filler contents of approximately 3.5 wt.%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.